06/01/2020 No. 156
Home | Photos | Articles & Comments | Books & Writings | Music | Contact Us | Links
Why Our Government Faces Fiscal Cliff Crisis and Others Don’t?
By Yu-Long Ling
May 1, 2013

Editor’s Note: We thank Professor Yu-Long Ling for contributing this article to www.ChinaUSFriendship.com; the article was first published on the 2013 March issue of the electronic magazine The ELM.



When Plato, the great Greek philosopher, once discussed with his students on the issue of justice, one of them said that when you pay off your debt, you are doing justice.  I think that we Americans can agree with this assessment. How to pay off our national debt (over $16 trillion), however, raises a thorny question.  A reasonable person understands that once you are in debt, you need to work harder to increase revenue and to decrease spending. Well, this is easier to say than to do.


Congress avoided the fiscal cliff at the end of last year through an agreement to increase taxes of those making more than $400,000 (for individual) or $450,000 (for couples).  Unfortunately, it failed to address the second part of the problem, reducing spending.  So what we have is a short-term fix. Republicans in Congress have made it clear that they oppose any more tax increase and insist on reducing spending.  President Obama has taken the position that he is not going to support spending cut without further raising tax. So both sides are only partly right in solving our debt crisis. We can expect another ugly showdown in the next few months. [At the end of February 2013, both sides were not able to reach a compromise on the debt crisis, leading to a mandatory cut of government expenditure across the board.]


Frustrated with our government’s inability to resolve the fiscal crisis, we need to examine why this problem happens only to our system of government. In countries with a parliamentary system of government, such as England and Japan, the head of the executive branch comes from the legislature.  Generally, the leader of the majority party in the legislature will be elected as the head of the executive branch.  Under this arrangement, whatever the executive head wants, the legislature will approve.  If a disagreement between the executive head and the legislature occurs, either the executive head will resign or the legislature will be dissolved, with a new election to follow.  Once the new legislature is elected, the new government will start over. Agreement between the two branches is thus assured.


Under our constitution, we adopted the separation of powers principle and created three branches of government.  By using the principle of checks and balances, no branch is allowed to dominate the government. As a result, conflict or competition among the branches frequently occurs. Our founding fathers thought that this is the way to make sound decisions for the common good.  What they did not anticipate is that many politicians of today care more about their own political agenda than that of their constituents.  In order to achieve their own individual goal, they often refuse to compromise to solve problems.  Gridlock is the result, and who suffers the most under this dysfunctional system of government?  You guessed it, we, the American people.


Unfortunately, the people are not blameless in this situation.  The government represents the people. It cannot create national debts without the people’s demand or approval. Raising tax or spending cut will inevitably hurt some groups of people. Thus, we happily elect politicians who promise not to raise tax or to cut government services.  The government has to keep borrowing money to keep it running.  As a result, we are in this terrible predicament.


British conservative philosopher, Edmund Burke once said that “Democracy breeds mediocrity.” Unfortunately, I cannot disagree. We chose our leaders and are stuck with them. It is sad, but true.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment, if you are not yet registered, Click here to register today! It's FREE and it's required.
ID: Password: Forget Password?
If you fail, please register again.
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The American Association for Chinese Studies (AACS), at its annual meeting held on October 16, 2010, at Wake Forest University of North Carolina, awarded Yu-Long Ling, retired professor of the Department of Political Science at the Franklin College of Indiana, the Distinguished Service Award in recognition for his outstanding contributions to Chinese studies in American academia. Professor Ling presented during the meeting his paper entitled "Ma Ying-jeou Government’s Outlook on the Cross-Strait Relations and a Peaceful Resolution." Professor Ling has taught at the Franklin College for 37 years, and was long-term columnist for the local Daily Journal analyzing and commenting on the mainland of China-Taiwan-United States trilateral relationship. In March 2009, the Voice of America and the Woodward Wilson International Center for Scholars (a well-known Washington think tank) invited Professor Ling to provide professional insights on the relations between Taiwan, the United States and the mainland of China. Professor Yu-Long Ling was educated in Taiwan and has a Ph.D. in political science at Indiana University. He produced numerous publications and often participated or organized symposia which made tremendous contributions to the relations between Taiwan, the United States and the mainland of China. The Distinguished Service Award is a Lifetime Achievement Award by the AACS. Over the past 52 years, there were fewer than five awardees. It is truly a special honor.
Copyright © 2007 China-U.S. Friendship Exchange, Inc. - All Rights Reserved. Terms Of Use Contact Us